<div class="wpcnt">
			<div class="wpa">
				<span class="wpa-about">Advertisements</span>
				<div class="u top_amp">
							<amp-ad width="300" height="265"
		 type="pubmine"
		 data-siteid="111265417"
		 data-section="2">
		</amp-ad>
				</div>
			</div>
		</div><p><a href="http://londonglossy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/griffin-to-hear-contempt-verdict.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full" title="BNP leader Nick Griffin will learn whether he has been found guilty of contempt of court" src="http://londonglossy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/min-griffin-to-hear-contempt-verdict.jpg" alt="BNP leader Nick Griffin will learn whether he has been found guilty of contempt of court"/></a></p>
<p>BNP leader Nick Griffin learns on Friday whether he has been found guilty of contempt of court.</p>
<p>The Equality and Human Rights Commission accused him at the High Court of failing to comply with a county court judgment ordering the removal of potentially racist clauses from his party&#8217;s constitution.</p>
<p>Robin Allen QC, appearing for the watchdog, said the BNP was &#8220;playing with&#8221; the commission and its officials instead of obeying the judgment.</p>
<p>The commission asked Lord Justice Moore-Bick and Mr Justice Ramsey, sitting in London, to take action against Mr Griffin, BNP deputy Simon Darby and party officer Tanya Lumby.</p>
<p>It wants fines imposed, or possibly the sequestration of party assets.</p>
<p>At the time of the contempt application in November, Mr Griffin was in hospital with suspected kidney stones and was described by a BNP spokesperson as being &#8220;in extreme pain&#8221;.</p>
<p>The application stemmed from a ruling that the BNP constitution breached discrimination laws because of a clause banning non-white members.</p>
<p>The constitution underwent revision, but last March Judge Paul Collins ruled at Central London County Court that the new version was indirectly discriminatory against those of mixed-race, because it required party applicants to oppose &#8220;any form of integration or assimilation of &#8230; the indigenous British&#8221;.</p>
<p>Another section required new members to submit to a two-hour vetting visit at their home by BNP officials, which Judge Collins ruled could be seen as &#8220;intimidatory&#8221;.</p>
<p>The judge ordered both sections to be removed from the constitution.</p>
			<div style="padding-bottom:15px;" class="wordads-tag" data-slot-type="belowpost">
				<div id="atatags-dynamic-belowpost-68ee9d1174d68">
					<script type="text/javascript">
						window.getAdSnippetCallback = function () {
							if ( false === ( window.isWatlV1 ?? false ) ) {
								// Use Aditude scripts.
								window.tudeMappings = window.tudeMappings || [];
								window.tudeMappings.push( {
									divId: 'atatags-dynamic-belowpost-68ee9d1174d68',
									format: 'belowpost',
								} );
							}
						}

						if ( document.readyState === 'loading' ) {
							document.addEventListener( 'DOMContentLoaded', window.getAdSnippetCallback );
						} else {
							window.getAdSnippetCallback();
						}
					</script>
				</div>
			</div>
Discover more from London Glossy Post
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.