President Obama backs Pentagon plan to close Guantanamo Bay

&Tab;&Tab;<div class&equals;"wpcnt">&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<div class&equals;"wpa">&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<span class&equals;"wpa-about">Advertisements<&sol;span>&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<div class&equals;"u top&lowbar;amp">&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<amp-ad width&equals;"300" height&equals;"265"&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab; type&equals;"pubmine"&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab; data-siteid&equals;"111265417"&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab; data-section&equals;"2">&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;<&sol;amp-ad>&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<&sol;div>&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<&sol;div>&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;<&sol;div><p>President Barack Obama has backed Pentagon plans to close the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>President Obama said the site in Cuba undermines national security and US values&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The Obama administration has released its long-awaited plan to close the detention centre at Guantanamo Bay and transfer remaining detainees to a facility in the US&comma; but the proposal ducks the question of where the facility would be located&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The plan delivered to Congress makes a financial argument for closing the controversial detention centre in Cuba&period; US officials say it calls for up to &dollar;475m in construction costs that would ultimately be offset by as much as &dollar;180m per year in operating cost savings&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The proposal is part of Barack Obama&&num;8217&semi;s last effort to make good on his unfulfilled 2008 campaign vow to close Guantanamo and persuade policymakers to allow the Defence Department to move nearly 60 detainees to the US&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>But with few specifics&comma; the proposal may only further antagonise policymakers who have repeatedly passed legislation banning any effort to move detainees to the US&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>US officials say the plan considers&comma; but does not name&comma; 13 locations in the US&comma; including seven existing prison facilities in Colorado&comma; South Carolina and Kansas&comma; as well as six other locations on military bases&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>They say the plan does not recommend a preferred site and the cost estimates are meant to provide a starting point for a conversation with Congress&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The seven facilities reviewed by a Pentagon assessment team last year were the US Disciplinary Barracks and Midwest Joint Regional Corrections Facility at Leavenworth&comma; Kansas&semi; the Consolidated Naval Brig&comma; Charleston&comma; South Carolina&semi; the Federal Correctional Complex&comma; which includes the medium&comma; maximum and supermax facilities in Florence&comma; Colorado&semi; and the Colorado State Penitentiary II in Canon City&comma; Colorado&comma; also known as the Centennial Correctional Facility&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>According to the officials&comma; the US facilities would cost between &dollar;265m and &dollar;305m to operate each year&period; The annual operating cost for Guantanamo is &dollar;445m&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>More detailed spending figures&comma; which are considered classified&comma; will be provided to Congress&comma; said the officials&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Late last year&comma; other US officials said the assessments by the Pentagon team suggested that the Centennial Correctional Facility in Colorado is a more suitable site to send detainees whom officials believe should never be released&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Members of Congress have been demanding the Guantanamo plan for months&comma; but those representing South Carolina&comma; Kansas and Colorado have voiced opposition to housing the detainees in their states&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The administration is currently prohibited by law from moving Guantanamo Bay detainees to the United States&period; Mr Obama has long opposed that prohibition and the White House has not ruled out the possibility that the president may attempt to close the prison through executive action&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Advocates of closing Guantanamo say the prison has long been a recruiting tool for militant groups and that holding extremists suspected of violent acts indefinitely without charges or trial sparks anger and dismay among US allies&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Opponents say moving the detainees will not eliminate that problem&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>There are currently 91 detainees at Guantanamo Bay&comma; of whom 35 are expected to be transferred out by this summer&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The rest are either facing trial by military commission or have been determined to be too dangerous to release but are not facing charges&period; Some cannot be charged because of insufficient evidence and some may face future prosecution or have been designated for indefinite detention under the international laws of war&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Seven detainees are in the early stages of trial by military commission&comma; including the five men accused of planning and aiding the September 11 terrorist attack&comma; and three have been convicted and are serving sentences&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>At its peak in 2003&comma; Guantanamo held nearly 680 detainees&comma; and there were about 245 when Mr Obama took office&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<div style&equals;"padding-bottom&colon;15px&semi;" class&equals;"wordads-tag" data-slot-type&equals;"belowpost">&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<div id&equals;"atatags-dynamic-belowpost-68cd375730690">&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<script type&equals;"text&sol;javascript">&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;window&period;getAdSnippetCallback &equals; function &lpar;&rpar; &lbrace;&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;if &lpar; false &equals;&equals;&equals; &lpar; window&period;isWatlV1 &quest;&quest; false &rpar; &rpar; &lbrace;&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&sol;&sol; Use Aditude scripts&period;&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;window&period;tudeMappings &equals; window&period;tudeMappings &vert;&vert; &lbrack;&rsqb;&semi;&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;window&period;tudeMappings&period;push&lpar; &lbrace;&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;divId&colon; 'atatags-dynamic-belowpost-68cd375730690'&comma;&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;format&colon; 'belowpost'&comma;&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&rcub; &rpar;&semi;&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&rcub;&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&rcub;&NewLine;&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;if &lpar; document&period;readyState &equals;&equals;&equals; 'loading' &rpar; &lbrace;&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;document&period;addEventListener&lpar; 'DOMContentLoaded'&comma; window&period;getAdSnippetCallback &rpar;&semi;&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&rcub; else &lbrace;&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;window&period;getAdSnippetCallback&lpar;&rpar;&semi;&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&rcub;&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<&sol;script>&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<&sol;div>&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;<&sol;div>


Discover more from London Glossy Post

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

- Advertisement -
Exit mobile version