Trump considers travel ban rewrite after stinging court defeat


Donald Trump is considering signing a “brand new order” after his refugee and immigration travel ban was halted in court.

The US president, speaking to reporters on Air Force One, said he expected his administration to win the legal battle over his original directive.

But he said the White House was also considering other alternatives, including making unspecified changes to the order, which could address some of the legal issues.

As Mr Trump flew to Florida for the weekend, his advisers debated their next steps after the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a restraining order on the original travel ban.

The White House directive had suspended the nation’s refugee programme and barred all entries from seven Muslim-majority countries.

A White House official initially suggested the administration would not ask the Supreme Court to overturn that order, but chief of staff Reince Priebus scrambled to clarify that “every single court option is on the table”, including a high court appeal or “fighting out this case on the merits” in a lower court.
Mr Trump’s executive order was hastily unveiled at the end of his first week in office.

While the White House boasted that he was fulfilling a campaign promise to toughen vetting procedures for people coming from countries with terror ties, the order caused chaos at airports in the US and sparked protests across the country.

The president has cast the order as crucial for national security.
Earlier, he promised to take action “very rapidly” to protect the US and its citizens in the wake of the appeal court decision, but he did not specify what steps he planned to take.

“We’ll be doing things to continue to make our country safe,” Mr Trump pledged at a news conference with Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe.

“It will happen rapidly. We will not allow people into our country who are looking to do harm to our people.”

The president’s comments were far more restrained than his angry reaction to last week’s initial court ruling blocking the travel ban when he attacked both the “so-called judge” in that case and the ruling, which he called “ridiculous”.

But Mr Trump continued to conjure images of unspecified danger, saying he had “learned tremendous things that you could only learn, frankly, if you were in a certain position, namely president”.

“And there are tremendous threats to our country. We will not allow that to happen, I can tell you that. We will not allow that to happen,” he said.

The 9th Circuit ruling represented a significant setback for Mr Trump in just his third week in office.
The appellate decision brushed aside arguments by the Justice Department that the president has the constitutional power to restrict entry to the United States and that the courts cannot second-guess his determination that such a step was needed to prevent terrorism.

Senate minority Leader Chuck Schumer tweeted that Mr Trump “ought to see the writing on the wall” and abandon the proposal and called on the president to “roll up his sleeves” and come up with “a real, bipartisan plan to keep us safe”.

House of Representatives Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi promised: “Democrats will continue to press for President Trump’s dangerous and unconstitutional ban to be withdrawn.”

And Mr Trump’s former presidential rival Hillary Clinton offered a terse response on Twitter, noting the unanimous appeal court vote: “3-0.”

Congress’ Republican leaders, House speaker Paul Ryan and Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell, declined to comment.

US District Judge James Robart issued the temporary restraining order halting the ban after Washington state and Minnesota sued, leading to the government’s appeal.

The Trump administration has said the seven nations – Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen – have raised terrorism concerns.

The states have argued that the executive order unconstitutionally blocked entry based on religion and the travel ban harmed individuals, businesses and universities.

Mr Trump and his aides frequently refer to a ruling by a federal judge in Boston who declined last week to extend a temporary injunction against Mr Trump’s travel ban.

In a separate federal ruling in Seattle, a different federal judge put the ban on hold nationwide and it is that judge’s decision that the White House has challenged.

“It’s a decision that we’ll win, in my opinion, very easily and, by the way, we won that decision in Boston,” Mr Trump said.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.